ARTICLE: Frederik DHONDT, "Hoe modern was het negentiende-eeuwse neutraliteitsrecht ?" (Pro Memorie. Bijdragen tot de Rechtsgeschiedenis der Nederlanden XXIV (2022), nr. 2, 218-254

 

(image: Georg Friedrich von Martens; source: Wikimedia Commons)

Prof. Frederik Dhondt's inaugural lecture for the OVR Exchange Chair 2020-2021, held at the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam on 18 May 2022, has been published in the second issue of Pro Memorie's XXIVth volume.

Abstract:

The law of neutrality evolved from 1776 to 1870, but not in a linear way. Enlightenment saw neutrality as an autonomous choice of a sovereign polity. The First League of Armed Neutrality (1780) and the Declaration of Paris (1856) can be seen as landmarks in the rise of the free ships/free goods-principle and the promotion of free trade. The French Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars brought a regression. The British restrictive position before 1856 was starkly criticized. Even in the late 1880s, the lack of codification and unity in the law of neutrality was striking: national case law, criminal law and ad hoc neutrality declarations remained essential sources for individuals and states alike to interpret the seemingly candid and simple twin obligation of impartiality and abstention. This period also saw the birth of the malleable concept permanent neutrality, imposed or guaranteed by the European Great Powers.

Read the article on the AUP website (DOI  10.5117/PROM2022.2.006.DHON)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CALL FOR PAPERS/APPEL A CONTRIBUTIONS: The Worlds of Pre-Modern Neutrality (ca. 1400-1800): Norms, Institutions and Practices (Antwerp: Conscience Heritage Library, 8-9 MAY 2025); DEADLINE 1 OCT 2024

SEMINAR: Michele SPANÒ (EHESS, Paris) on "Re-reading Pasukanis" [CORE Seminar in Legal Theory] (Brussels: VUB, 4 APR, 12:00) [HYBRID]